Here is an entry from a Christian blog about a death from HIV on the border.

This Lancet 'interview' is really an infomercial for WHO's global HIV strategy. It makes more interesting reading than the strategy documents themselves.

It is interesting to speculate who is the doctor, who the patient and what is the tumor … but whining about a two hotel double standard diverts attention from substantive issues.

This posting from the ITPC list puzzles the [him] moderator. Aren't the needs of positive sex workers similar to the needs of other positive people? Even if there are special needs, the wide range of settings in which transactional and commercial sex takes place makes generalisation extremely difficult. The [him] moderator knows he is being more provocative than usual in this posting. Comments?

HIV Information for Myanmar [him] offers congratulations to the four community members and the organisations they support.

The story in the Irrawaddy offers no opinion about the quality of the film that won. Can anyone tell us if the film is good?

Here is the new Three Diseases Fund Round 2 announcement. Good luck. The notice and application template is available from the moderator or on the [him] website.

Coinfected people need treatment for both conditions. This is tricky but not fatal.

Is this news? The [him] moderator sees not much new in these 'rules'. Is he missing something? Can anyone who was there at the meeting enlighten [him]? And others.

Though the [him] moderator is pleased that the KNO is taking interest in issues surrounding HIV, this article raises more questions than it answers …

The [him] moderator has received this anonymous comment on the user charges …